這篇文章主要講解了“PostgreSQL數(shù)據(jù)庫B-Tree索引的物理存儲結(jié)構(gòu)是怎樣的”,文中的講解內(nèi)容簡單清晰,易于學習與理解,下面請大家跟著小編的思路慢慢深入,一起來研究和學習“PostgreSQL數(shù)據(jù)庫B-Tree索引的物理存儲結(jié)構(gòu)是怎樣的”吧!
成都創(chuàng)新互聯(lián)長期為1000+客戶提供的網(wǎng)站建設(shè)服務(wù),團隊從業(yè)經(jīng)驗10年,關(guān)注不同地域、不同群體,并針對不同對象提供差異化的產(chǎn)品和服務(wù);打造開放共贏平臺,與合作伙伴共同營造健康的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)生態(tài)環(huán)境。為嵐皋企業(yè)提供專業(yè)的網(wǎng)站設(shè)計制作、成都做網(wǎng)站,嵐皋網(wǎng)站改版等技術(shù)服務(wù)。擁有十年豐富建站經(jīng)驗和眾多成功案例,為您定制開發(fā)。我們繼續(xù)使用上一節(jié)使用的測試數(shù)據(jù),這一次我們追加插入>1000行的數(shù)據(jù)。
-- 為方便對比,插入數(shù)據(jù)前先查看索引元數(shù)據(jù)頁 testdb=# select * from bt_metap('pk_t_index'); magic | version | root | level | fastroot | fastlevel | oldest_xact | last_cleanup_num_tuples --------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------+-------------+------------------------- 340322 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 (1 row) testdb=# do $$ testdb$# begin testdb$# for i in 19..1020 loop testdb$# insert into t_index (id, c1, c2) values (i, '#'||i||'#', '#'||i||'#'); testdb$# end loop; testdb$# end $$; DO testdb=# select count(*) from t_index; count ------- 1008 (1 row)
插入數(shù)據(jù)后,重新查看索引元數(shù)據(jù)頁信息:
testdb=# select * from bt_metap('pk_t_index'); magic | version | root | level | fastroot | fastlevel | oldest_xact | last_cleanup_num_tuples --------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------+-------------+------------------------- 340322 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1 (1 row)
root block從原來的block 1變?yōu)閎lock 3,查看block 3的的Special space:
testdb=# select * from bt_page_stats('pk_t_index',3); blkno | type | live_items | dead_items | avg_item_size | page_size | free_size | btpo_prev | btpo_next | btpo | btpo_flags -------+------+------------+------------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+------+------------ 3 | r | 3 | 0 | 13 | 8192 | 8096 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 (1 row)
type=r,表示root index block,這個block有3個index entries(live_items=3,該index block只是root block(btpo_flags=BTP_ROOT)。下面我們來看看這個block中的index entries:
testdb=# select * from bt_page_items('pk_t_index',3); itemoffset | ctid | itemlen | nulls | vars | data ------------+---------+---------+-------+------+------------------------- 1 | (1,0) | 8 | f | f | 2 | (2,53) | 16 | f | f | 7b 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 3 | (4,105) | 16 | f | f | e9 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 (3 rows)
root/branch index block存儲的是指向其他index block的指針。第1行,index entries指向第1個index block,由于該block沒有l(wèi)eft block,因此,itemlen只有8個字節(jié),數(shù)據(jù)范圍為1-\x0000017b(十進制值為379);第2行,index entries指向第2個index block,數(shù)據(jù)范圍為380-\x000002e9(745);第3行,index entries指向第4個index block,數(shù)據(jù)范圍為大于745的值。
這里有個疑惑,正常來說,root index block中的entries應(yīng)指向index block,但ctid的值(2,53)和(4,105)指向的卻是Heap Table Block,PG11 Beta2的Bug?
In a B-tree leaf page, ctid points to a heap tuple. In an internal page, the block number part of ctid points to another page in the index itself, while the offset part (the second number) is ignored and is usually 1.
testdb=# select * from heap_page_items(get_raw_page('t_index',2)) where t_ctid = '(2,53)'; lp | lp_off | lp_flags | lp_len | t_xmin | t_xmax | t_field3 | t_ctid | t_infomask2 | t_infomask | t_hoff | t_bits | t_oid | t_data ----+--------+----------+--------+---------+--------+----------+--------+-------------+------------+--------+--------+-------+------------------------------------------ 53 | 5648 | 1 | 43 | 1612755 | 0 | 360 | (2,53) | 3 | 2306 | 24 | | | \x7b0100001323333739232020200d2333373923 (1 row) testdb=# select * from heap_page_items(get_raw_page('t_index',4)) where t_ctid = '(4,105)'; lp | lp_off | lp_flags | lp_len | t_xmin | t_xmax | t_field3 | t_ctid | t_infomask2 | t_infomask | t_hoff | t_bits | t_oid | t_data -----+--------+----------+--------+---------+--------+----------+---------+-------------+------------+--------+--------+-------+------------------------------------------ 105 | 3152 | 1 | 43 | 1612755 | 0 | 726 | (4,105) | 3 | 2306 | 24 | | | \xe90200001323373435232020200d2337343523 (1 row)
回到正題,我們首先看看index block 1的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù):
testdb=# select * from bt_page_stats('pk_t_index',1); blkno | type | live_items | dead_items | avg_item_size | page_size | free_size | btpo_prev | btpo_next | btpo | btpo_flags -------+------+------------+------------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+------+------------ 1 | l | 367 | 0 | 16 | 8192 | 808 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 (1 row) testdb=# select * from bt_page_items('pk_t_index',1) limit 10; itemoffset | ctid | itemlen | nulls | vars | data ------------+--------+---------+-------+------+------------------------- 1 | (2,53) | 16 | f | f | 7b 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 2 | (0,1) | 16 | f | f | 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3 | (0,2) | 16 | f | f | 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4 | (0,3) | 16 | f | f | 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 | (0,4) | 16 | f | f | 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6 | (0,6) | 16 | f | f | 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7 | (0,5) | 16 | f | f | 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8 | (0,8) | 16 | f | f | 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 9 | (0,9) | 16 | f | f | 14 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 | (0,10) | 16 | f | f | 15 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (10 rows)
第1個block的Special space,其中type=l,表示leaf index block,btpo_flags=BTP_LEAF表示該block僅僅為leaf index block,block的index entries指向heap table。同時,這個block里面有367個items,右邊兄弟block號是2(btpo_next)。
值得注意到,index entries的第1個條目,是大值\x017b,第2個條目才是最小值,接下來的條目是按順序存儲的其他值。源碼的README(src/backend/access/nbtree/README)里面有解釋:
On a page that is not rightmost in its tree level, the "high key" is
kept in the page's first item, and real data items start at item 2.
The link portion of the "high key" item goes unused. A page that is
rightmost has no "high key", so data items start with the first item.
Putting the high key at the left, rather than the right, may seem odd,
but it avoids moving the high key as we add data items.
官方文檔也有相關(guān)解釋:
Note that the first item on any non-rightmost page (any page with a non-zero value in the btpo_next field) is the page's “high key”, meaning its data serves as an upper bound on all items appearing on the page, while its ctid field is meaningless. Also, on non-leaf pages, the first real data item (the first item that is not a high key) is a “minus infinity” item, with no actual value in its data field. Such an item does have a valid downlink in its ctid field, however.
下面我們再來看看index block 2&4:
testdb=# select * from bt_page_stats('pk_t_index',2); blkno | type | live_items | dead_items | avg_item_size | page_size | free_size | btpo_prev | btpo_next | btpo | btpo_flags -------+------+------------+------------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+------+------------ 2 | l | 367 | 0 | 16 | 8192 | 808 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 (1 row) testdb=# select * from bt_page_items('pk_t_index',2) limit 10; itemoffset | ctid | itemlen | nulls | vars | data ------------+---------+---------+-------+------+------------------------- 1 | (4,105) | 16 | f | f | e9 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 2 | (2,53) | 16 | f | f | 7b 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 3 | (2,54) | 16 | f | f | 7c 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 4 | (2,55) | 16 | f | f | 7d 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 | (2,56) | 16 | f | f | 7e 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 6 | (2,57) | 16 | f | f | 7f 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 7 | (2,58) | 16 | f | f | 80 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 8 | (2,59) | 16 | f | f | 81 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 9 | (2,60) | 16 | f | f | 82 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 | (2,61) | 16 | f | f | 83 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 (10 rows) testdb=# select * from bt_page_stats('pk_t_index',4); blkno | type | live_items | dead_items | avg_item_size | page_size | free_size | btpo_prev | btpo_next | btpo | btpo_flags -------+------+------------+------------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+------+------------ 4 | l | 276 | 0 | 16 | 8192 | 2628 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1 row) testdb=# select * from bt_page_items('pk_t_index',4) limit 10; itemoffset | ctid | itemlen | nulls | vars | data ------------+---------+---------+-------+------+------------------------- 1 | (4,105) | 16 | f | f | e9 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 2 | (4,106) | 16 | f | f | ea 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 3 | (4,107) | 16 | f | f | eb 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 4 | (4,108) | 16 | f | f | ec 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 | (4,109) | 16 | f | f | ed 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 6 | (4,110) | 16 | f | f | ee 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 7 | (4,111) | 16 | f | f | ef 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 8 | (4,112) | 16 | f | f | f0 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 9 | (4,113) | 16 | f | f | f1 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 | (4,114) | 16 | f | f | f2 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 (10 rows)
感謝各位的閱讀,以上就是“PostgreSQL數(shù)據(jù)庫B-Tree索引的物理存儲結(jié)構(gòu)是怎樣的”的內(nèi)容了,經(jīng)過本文的學習后,相信大家對PostgreSQL數(shù)據(jù)庫B-Tree索引的物理存儲結(jié)構(gòu)是怎樣的這一問題有了更深刻的體會,具體使用情況還需要大家實踐驗證。這里是創(chuàng)新互聯(lián),小編將為大家推送更多相關(guān)知識點的文章,歡迎關(guān)注!